Fashion Dress Black Tights School Uniform Young Girls

Standardized outfit worn by students of an educational institution

A schoolhouse uniform is a uniform worn by students primarily for a school or otherwise an educational institution. They are common in primary and secondary schools in various countries.

An example of a uniform would be requiring button-down shirts, trousers for boys and blouses, pleated skirts for girls, with both wearing blazers. A compatible can even be as simple as requiring collared shirts, or restricting color choices and limiting items students are allowed to wear.

Compatible [edit]

Although often used interchangeably, in that location is an important distinction between dress codes and schoolhouse uniforms: according to scholars such as Nathan Joseph, vesture tin but be considered a uniform when it "(a) serves as a group emblem, (b) certifies an institution'due south legitimacy by revealing individual'due south relative positions and (c) suppresses individuality."^[ane] Conversely, a dress code is much less restrictive, and focuses "on promoting modesty and discouraging anti-social mode statements", co-ordinate to Marian Wilde.^[2] Examples of a dress lawmaking would be not allowing ripped clothing, no logos or limiting the amount of skin that can be shown.

History [edit]

Schoolboys in France, 1880

It is difficult to trace the origins of the uniform every bit at that place is no comprehensive written history, but rather a variety of known influences. School uniforms are believed to be a practice which dates to the 16th century in the United Kingdom. Information technology is believed that the Christ's Infirmary Schoolhouse in England in 1552 was the first schoolhouse to use a school uniform.^[3] Students were given a uniform that nigh notably consisted of a long blue coat and yellow, human knee-high socks.^[4] An about identical compatible is still worn by students attending the school today.^[iv] The earliest documented proof of institutionalised use of a standard bookish dress dates back to 1222 when the then Archbishop of Canterbury ordered the wearing of the cappa clausa.^[5] This monastic and bookish practice evolved into collegiate uniforms in England, particularly in charity schools where uniform dress was often provided for poor children. Universities, principal schools and secondary schools used uniforms as a mark of course and status.^[6] Although school uniforms tin often be considered conservative and old-fashioned, uniforms in recent years have inverse equally societal apparel codes have inverse.^[7]

Contemporary [edit]

In the United States, a movement toward using uniforms in state schools began when Pecker Clinton addressed it in the 1996 State of the Spousal relationship, saying: "If information technology means that teenagers will stop killing each other over designer jackets, then our public schools should exist able to crave their students to wear uniforms."^[8] As of 1998 approximately 25% of all U.S. public elementary, center and junior high schools had adopted a uniform policy or were considering a policy, and two-thirds were implemented between 1995 and 1997.^[9] New York City's then-new schools chancellor, Rudy Crew, made it clear that he would not follow Clinton'south thought.^[ten]

There are an affluence of theories and empirical studies looking at school uniforms, making statements virtually their effectiveness. These theories and studies elaborate on the benefits and also the shortcomings of compatible policies. The upshot of nature vs. nurture comes into play, as uniforms impact the perceptions of masculinity and femininity, over-simplify issues of gender classification, and work to channel, subdue or punish the sexuality of female person, male person, transgender and intersex.^[11] Uniforms bring a diverseness of pros, cons, and major legal implications and controversies.

There are two principal empirical findings that are virtually oftentimes cited in the political rhetoric surrounding the compatible fence. Ane of these, the case report of the Long Embankment Unified School District, is near frequently cited in support of school uniforms and their effectiveness whereas Effects of Student Uniforms on Omnipresence, Behavior Problems, Substance Use, and Academic Achievement is the most frequently cited research in opposition to the implementation of schoolhouse uniform policies.

Furnishings of uniforms on students [edit]

In many Japanese schools, students take off their outdoor shoes and wear uwabaki, an indoor soft slipper.

The case study of the Long Beach Unified School District was the report of the offset large, urban school in the Us to implement a compatible policy. In 1994, mandatory schoolhouse uniforms were implemented for the districts uncomplicated and middle schools as a strategy to accost the students' behaviour issues. The district simultaneously implemented a longitudinal study to research the effects of the uniforms on student behavior. The study attributed favourable student behavioral changes and a significant drop in school discipline problems to the mandatory compatible policy. Wearing school uniforms was associated with fewer absences and truancies and fewer referrals to the office for beliefs issues. Suspensions and expulsions were reduced past 28% (elementary) and 36% (middle school), crime and vandalism by 74% (elementary) and 18% (center school).^[12]

Colombian master schoolhouse students with their teacher

Other inquiry constitute that uniforms were not an constructive deterrent to decrease truancy, did not decrease behavior problems, decrease substance use, and in fact may exist associated with poorer educatee achievement relative to students not required to article of clothing school uniforms.^[13]

A report suggested that "instead of direct affecting specific outcomes, uniforms deed as a catalyst for change and provide a highly visible opportunity for additional programs" within schools. In fact, Brunsma et al., 1998 considered that this was the case with the Long Beach Unified Schoolhouse Commune example study as several additional reform efforts were implemented simultaneously with the mandatory uniform policy.^[14]

Brunsma stated that despite the inconclusiveness of the effects of uniforms, they became more common because "this is an result of children's rights, of social control, and one related to increasing racial, form and gender inequalities in our schools."^[15]

Laws and rulings [edit]

A grouping moving picture of Thai students (uniforms with night blue shorts) and Singaporean students (uniforms with cyan skirts and shorts) in forepart of the Chiliad Palace

As uniforms have become more normalised, at that place take also been an increasing number of lawsuits brought confronting schoolhouse districts. According to David Brunsma, one in four public unproblematic schools and one in eight public middle and loftier schools in the Us take policies dictating what a student wears to school.^[xvi] The school code within states' constitutions typically asserts that it allows the board of schoolhouse directors to make reasonable rules and regulations as they come across fit in managing the schoolhouse'south affairs. Every bit of 2008, there are currently 23 states that let school districts to mandate schoolhouse uniforms.^[17] The constitutional objections usually brought upon school districts tend to fall into 1 of the following two categories: (1) a violation of the students' Beginning Amendment right to costless expression (2) a violation of parents' right to heighten their children without government interference. Although up until this indicate, The Supreme Courtroom has not ruled on a case involving school uniforms directly, in the 1968 conclusion Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Commune, the Court ruled that upon entering school, students do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of spoken communication.^[18]

Internationally, there are differing views of school uniforms. In the Australian state of Queensland, Ombudsman Fred Albietz ruled in 1998 that state schools may not require uniforms.^[19] In the Philippines, the Department of Education abolished the requirement of school uniforms in public schools.^[twenty] In England and Wales, technically a state school may not permanently exclude students for "breaching school uniform policy", under a policy promulgated past the Department for Children, Schools and Families but students not wearing the correct uniform are asked to become home and change. In Scotland, some local councils (that have responsibleness for delivering land education) do not insist on students wearing a uniform every bit a precondition to attending and taking function in curricular activities.^[21] Turkey abolished mandatory uniforms in 2010.^[22]

Examples of lawsuits in the The states [edit]

Canady v. Bossier Parish School Lath [edit]

In the Canady v. Bossier Parish School Lath lawsuit in 2000, a Louisiana district court ruled in favour of the schoolhouse board because it did non see how the free spoken language rights of the students were being violated due to the school lath'southward uniform policy. Even though the plaintiff appealed the decision, the Fifth Circuit Courtroom as well ruled in favour of the school lath after implementing a four-step system that is nevertheless used today. Firstly, a school lath has to have the right to fix a policy. Secondly, the policy must be determined to support a fundamental involvement of the board as a whole. Thirdly, the guidelines cannot take been set for the purpose of censorship. Finally, the limits on student expression cannot be greater than the interest of the lath. As long as these four policies are in place, then no constitutional violation can be claimed.^[23]

Littlefield v. Forney Independent School District [edit]

In the Forney Independent School District of Forney, Texas in 2001, the school board decided to implement a school uniform policy allowing the students to wear a polo shirt, oxford shirt or blouse in iv possible colours, and bluish or khaki trousers or shirts, a skirt or jumper. While at that place was some flexibility with shoes, certain types were prohibited along with any sort of amorphous clothes. The parents of the Littlefield family unit requested that their son be exempt from the policy, only were denied. In response, the Littlefields filed a lawsuit confronting the school commune, nether the pretenses that this uniform mandate infringed on their rights as parents to control how they brought up their children and their didactics. They even went as far equally to cite an infringement on religious freedom, claiming that opting out of the uniforms on the grounds of organized religion allowed the schoolhouse to rank the validity of certain religions. Before trial, the Commune Court dismissed the instance, and so the family appealed. Ultimately, the 5th Excursion Court ruled that the students' rights were not being violated even though the claims presented were valid. They ruled that school rules derived from the pedagogy would override the parents' right to control their children'south upbringing in this specific situation. As far equally the religious liberty violation accusations, the court ruled that the policy did not take a religious goal, and thus did not infringe on religious freedom rights.^[24]

Jacobs 5. Clark County School District [edit]

In 2003, Liberty High School, a school of the Clark County Schoolhouse Commune in Henderson, Nevada, implemented a uniform policy of khakis and reddish, white or blueish polo shirts. A junior by the proper noun of Kimberly Jacobs was suspended a total of v times because she wore a religious shirt to schoolhouse and got cited for uniform violations. Her family sued the Clark County School District under the claims that her First Amendment rights were beingness infringed upon and that the compatible policy was causing students to be deprived of due process. The plaintiff'southward requests were for injunctive relief, the expunging of suspensions from Jacob's school record and awarding of damages. The injunction was granted to the family unit significant that the schoolhouse could no longer discipline her for breaking the uniform policy. At this ruling, the school district appealed. The next courtroom ruled on the side of the school commune every bit it adamant that the compatible policy was in fact neutral and constitutional, and information technology dismissed the claims of the plaintiff.^[25]

Frudden v. Washoe Canton School District [edit]

In 2011, a Nevada public elementary school of the Washoe Canton Schoolhouse Commune decided to add the schoolhouse's motto, Tomorrow's Leaders embroidered in small letters on the shirt. In response, Mary and John Frudden, parents of a student sued the school district on the basis of it violating the 1st Amendment. The court ultimately dismissed the case filed by the Fruddens over the uniforms. Notwithstanding, the family appealed, and two years later on, a iii-judge console of the 9th U.Southward. Circuit Court of Appeals heard the instance. The court ruled to contrary the previous determination of dismissing the case, and also questioned the apparent policy for students that were role of a nationally recognised group such equally Boy Scouts and Daughter Scouts who were able to article of clothing the uniforms in identify of the schoolhouse ones on regular coming together days. The 9th excursion panel ruled that the school had non provided enough evidence for why it instituted this policy, and that the family was never given a chance to contend.^[26]

[edit]

Schoolgirls in Nepal. Some schoolhouse uniform policies (e.one thousand. Vietnam) include trousers for girls.

There are several positive and negative social implications of uniforms on both the students wearing them and society every bit a whole.

Perceptions of masculinity and femininity [edit]

One of the criticisms of uniforms is that information technology imposes standards of masculinity and femininity from a young age. Uniforms are considered a form of subject field that schools employ to control student behavior and often promote conventional gendered clothes.^{[27] [28]}

Boys often are required to wear trousers, belts,^[29] and closed-toe shoes and have their shirts tucked in at all times. They are also often required to have their hair cut short. Some critics allege that this uniform is associated with the dress of a professional person business man, which, they claim, gives boys at a young age the impression that masculinity is gained through business organization success.^[thirty]

For girls, many uniforms promote femininity by requiring girls to article of clothing skirts. Skirts are seen past some critics every bit a symbol of femininity because they restrict movement and strength certain ways of sitting and playing.^[28] Uniforms that include an frock for girls may advise that the appropriate feminine societal role is a primarily domestic one. Some girls' school uniforms take been criticized as having an uncomfortable blueprint, which prevents girls from freedom of motion and exposes girls to cold during winter.^[31]

School uniforms are embedded with gender symbolism. Schools that require students to wear a formal compatible almost universally provide trousers for boys and skirts or dresses for girls. Skirts differentiate the female person from the male, thereby confirming traditional gender identities for students who must clothing the correct attire corresponding to their sexual activity. Skirts and dresses need a particular type of feminine gender performance, whereas trousers need a particular masculine gender operation. Past forcing students to habiliment attire that corresponds with their sex inherently assigns the ways a student must perform their gender. This causes controversy when a educatee does not want to identify with a gender that does non align with their sexual practice. There are rarely guidelines that allow for students to dress according to their performed gender, but almost always according to their sex activity assigned at birth.^{[32] [ page needed ]}

Sexualization of girls [edit]

Around eye or junior schoolhouse, students begin going through puberty. Uniforms can exist seen equally a way to restrict the sexualization of girls by taking the focus abroad from sexuality and focus it on academics in a school setting for girls.^[33]

Sometimes the want to prevent overtly sexualized wear through uniforms can fail. Every bit an example, miniskirts accept been very popular in Nihon, where they are common parts of school uniforms and came to exist worn within the Kogal culture.^{[34] [35]}

"The pleasure our culture derives from gazing at girls who look feminine conflicts with girls' freedom to run around unselfconsciously and to develop their gross motor talents every bit boys are encouraged to do" (Collins et al. 1996, p. 170). Schoolgirl uniforms are used in costumes in the context of "Sexy Schoolgirl" and are sold on costume sites yr round. The idea of the female school uniform has become sexual and in Great britain a new survey from Plan International United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland found that a 3rd of girls accept been sexually harassed while wearing their school compatible. Schoolhouse uniforms can encourage harassment equally children, as our culture defines the "schoolgirl look" to be sexual. Children as young as 8 years quondam report being victims of, or witnesses to, harassment. Two-thirds of the children questioned in the survey said they have experienced "unwanted sexual attention" in public, and 35 percentage said they have been touched, groped or grabbed without their consent. These experiences teach girls that existence harassed by men is just a part of growing up. The perception of schoolgirl uniforms allows for men to harass girls at a immature age, causing girls to self-objectify their bodies from the offset of their schooling experience.^{[32] [36] [37]}

Controversies [edit]

General [edit]

Cuban high schoolgirls, 2009

Principal schoolhouse boy and girl in Malaysia

In some cultures, the topic of schoolhouse uniforms has sparked a multitude of controversies and debates over the years.^[38] Debates apropos the constitutionality and economic feasibility of uniforms besides contribute to the controversy.

In the United States, the implementation of school uniforms began following ten years of inquiry indicating the effectiveness of private schools. Some land-school reformers cited this research to support policies linked to individual and Cosmic school success. Some public-schoolhouse administrators hence began implementing compatible policies to better the overall schoolhouse environs and academic achievement of the students. This is based on the assumption that uniforms are the direct cause of behavioral and bookish issue changes.^[xiii] However, within the Catholic school literature, schoolhouse uniforms have never been acknowledged as a principal gene in producing a Cosmic school consequence.^{[39] [thirteen]}

Another expanse of controversy regarding school compatible and clothes code policies circumduct around the issue of gender. Nowadays, more teenagers are more oft "dressing to articulate, or derange gender identity and sexual orientation", which brings near "responses from schoolhouse officials that ranged from indifferences to applause to bans".^[xl] In 2009, there were multiple conflicts across the United States arising from disparities between the students' perception of their own gender, and the school administrators' perception of the students' gender identity. Instances include the following:^[41]

• Spring 2009: Marion Canton, Florida – Students must wearing apparel "in keeping with their gender." A male child came to school wearing high-heeled boots, a stuffed bra, and a V-neck T-shirt; he was sent home to change because he was "cantankerous-dressing."
• August 2009: A Mississippi senior daughter was barred from yearbook considering she had posed in a tuxedo.
• October 2009: A Cobb County, Georgia schoolhouse sent dwelling a boy who favored wigs, makeup, and skinny jeans.
• November 2009: A cross-dressing Houston senior was sent domicile because his wig violated the schoolhouse's dress code rule that a male child's hair may not be "longer than the bottom of a regular shirt collar."

Although not all schools in the United States are required to vesture school uniforms, the Us is slowly adopting the employ of school uniforms. "Well-nigh one in 5 United states public schools required students to habiliment uniforms during the 2011-2012 schoolhouse yr, upwardly from one in 8 in 2003-2004."^[42] The credo of school compatible is that it will create a safer surround for students and assistance with equality. In some areas uniforms have become essential due to the poverty level that the schools reside in. "Mandatory uniform policies in public schools are found more commonly in high-poverty areas."^[43]

Stephanie Northen of The Guardian wrote that schoolhouse uniforms are less controversial in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland compared to the Us and are commonly not opposed on free oral communication grounds.^[15]

School girls of Argentine republic

Positives [edit]

Students in school uniform in the Uk

Ethiopian schoolhouse children

Advocates of uniforms have proposed multiple reasons supporting their implementation and claiming their success in schools. Advocates believe that uniforms impact student safety past decreasing student victimization, gang action, and fights.^[14]

Kathleen Wade conducted an experiment to meet if bullying and gang presence was college in compatible or non-uniform schools. The enquiry was done with multiple schools where she gave a questionnaire to both students, and faculty to run across if there was a significant difference. Her results showed that bullying and gang presence significantly decreases with students wearing school uniforms.^[44]

• Differentiating strangers from students in school buildings

For example, in the start year of the mandatory uniform policy in Long Beach, California, officials reported that fighting in schools decreased by more than 50%, set on and battery by 34%, sexual practice offenses by 74%, and robbery by 66%.^[44]

Advocates also believe that uniforms increase student learning and positive attitudes toward school through:

• Enhanced learning environments
• Heightened school pride
• Increased student accomplishment
• High levels of preparedness
• Conformity to organizational goals
• Increased take a chance of staying in school^[45]
• Increased delivery to learning^[45]
• Increased employ of schoolhouse setting to the student'southward advantage^[45]

Wearing uniforms leads to decreased behavior problems by increasing attendance rates, lowering pause rates, and decreasing substance utilise among the student trunk. Proponents also attribute positive psychological outcomes like increased cocky-esteem, increased spirit, and reinforced feelings of oneness among students to wearing uniforms. Additional proponent arguments include that school uniforms:^[46]

• Encourage bailiwick
• Assist students resist peer pressure to purchase trendy clothes
• Diminish economic and social barriers between students

Currently, pros of school uniforms center around how uniforms affect school environments. Proponents have constitute a meaning positive impact on schoolhouse climate, safety, and students' self-perception from the implementation of uniforms.

Negatives [edit]

The opposing side of uniforms has claimed their ineffectiveness using a variety of justifications, a variety of which accept research supporting them. Some of the cons to schoolhouse uniforms include the post-obit legal, financial, and questionable effectiveness concerns:^[14] The primary concern with school uniforms or strict dress codes is that it limits the ability of students to limited themselves. Vesture is viewed as a hateful of expression – making all students clothing the same clothes or limit them to what they can wear can disrupt their sense of identity. 1 of the main controversies focuses on dress code policies versus freedom of speech.^[47] This establishes that students cannot wear the latest trends or clothes that the school finds that interrupt the learning surround. Even so, students can wear habiliment that express their faith. "Both the Constitution and most state laws protect students' rights to wear religious attire... such as the wearing of a turban, yarmulke, or headscarf."^[47]

Another negative aspect of school uniforms is that the policy can exist sexist. Boys and girls are often not disciplined in the same means when information technology comes to dress codes. Girls are more commonly disciplined for sure articles of clothing that are prohibited because they "distract" boys. "Transgender students accept been sent dwelling for wearing clothing different from what's expected of their legalness, while others take been excluded from yearbooks."^[48]

Uniforms besides generally disadvantage students, especially girls, in freedom of movement and comfort. The research was conducted on an Australian independent individual school and its uniform. Condolement-wise, for boys, the blazer was also hot/cold and uncomfortable. For girls, the low-cal coloured cotton fiber schoolhouse dress was restrictive, see-through, hot, uncomfortable, and impractical. Furthermore, the stockings were often cold, grey woolen kilt was too heavy and restrictive of motion, and the current of air could cause information technology to reveal more than the girls wanted. When playing and moving around, for boys, the school tie ^[49] was a choking hazard, and the trousers had no stretch. For girls, the clothes/skirt acquired modesty issues (e.g. difficult to swing on monkey confined/run around while keeping her privacy, hence stop existence active), and the kilts were are too large and heavy.^[fifty]

Research on how school uniforms and school dress codes influence the pupil tin exist inconclusive. "In the U.S., over half of public schools accept a dress code, which ofttimes outline gender-specific policies."^[48]

• Legal concerns
  • Focus on the supposition that requiring a uniform violates children's individual rights (Thomas, 1994; Virginia State Dep't of Edu, 1992)
  • Mandatory compatible policies are being considered largely for urban school districts, and, hence are being forced on a predominantly minority and poor student population (Thomas, 1994)
• No effect on social status
  • Many students felt the school uniform policy had little impact on the social dynamic of the school and students found ways to express individuality by making pocket-size alterations to the school uniform (Da Costa, 2006^[51]). Some parents and students interviewed in a research nearly the social aspect of school uniforms said that uniforms were a violation of their rights and liberty. "Like adults, children's liberty to choose or to act is also circumscribed by the community – massively so by schools, with their high density, constant supervision and evaluation, lack of privacy, and the obligatory nature of their activities." (Bodine, 2003^[52])
• Financial concerns
  • Groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union have voiced concerns about the cost of uniforms, specifically that some disadvantaged parents are unable to beget them (Gursky, 1996)
• Questionable effectiveness of those policies
  • Strongest opponents of uniform policies accuse that no empirical evidence exists to support the numerous and varied claims of uniform proponents (LaPorte, Holoman, & Alleyne, 1992)
  • School uniforms suppress students' individuality by mandating standardization of appearance and removing student expression (Joseph, 1986^[53])
  • While uniform policies have been linked to school climate, safety, and student cocky-perception, there is no evidence to indicate that a uniform policy increases academic accomplishment (Wade & Stafford, 2003^[54])

According to Marian Wilde,^[55] additional opponent arguments include that school uniforms:

• Are only a Rough-and-tumble on the issue of schoolhouse violence
• Make students a target for bullies from other schools
• Are an unfair additional expense for parents who pay taxes for a costless public education
• Are hard to enforce in state/public (authorities) schools

Run across also [edit]

• School uniforms by country
• Cosmic schoolhouse uniform
• Uniform fetishism
• Schoolbag
• Sumptuary police

References [edit]

1. ^ Joseph, Nathan (1986). Uniforms and nonuniforms : communication through article of clothing. New York: Greenwood Press. ISBN0313251959.
2. ^ Wilde, Marian. "Practice Uniforms Make Schools Better". GreatSchools.net.
3. ^ Scott, Jenny (5 September 2014). "School uniforms: A history of 'rebellion and conformity'." BBC News. Retrieved 13 Jan 2020.
4. ^ ^{a b} "History of the Compatible". www.christs-hospital.org.united kingdom . Retrieved 20 November 2018.
5. ^ David 50. Brunsma. "A Brief History of School Uniforms and Dress Codes". The School Compatible Move and What It Tells Nearly American Instruction. pp. 3 ff.
6. ^ Brunsma, David L. (2004). The School Uniform Movement and What it Tells United states of america nearly American Education : a Symbolic Crusade. Lanham, Md. [u.a.]: ScarecrowEducation. p. 4. ISBN157886125X.
7. ^ Davidson, Alexander; Rae, John (19 February 1990). Blazers, Badges and Boaters: Pictorial History of Schoolhouse Uniform. Praeger. ISBN0906619254.
8. ^ Boutelle, Marsha (2003). "UNIFORMS: Are They A Good Fit?". Educational Assimilate. 73 (half dozen): 34–37.
9. ^ Wade, Kathleen; Stafford, Mary (Baronial 2003). "Public Schoolhouse Uniforms: Outcome on Perceptions of Gang Presence, School Climate, and Student Self-Perceptions". Education and Urban Society. 35 (4): 399–420. doi:10.1177/0013124503255002. S2CID 145149716.
10. ^ Sarah Kershaw (30 March 1996). "Crew Volition Not Pursue School Uniform Rule". The New York Times.
11. ^ Jane Tynan and Lisa Godson, eds., Uniform: Habiliment and Discipline in the Modern World (London: Bloomsbury, 2019), ISBN 9781350045576; Todd A. DeMitchell and Richard Fossey, The Challenges of Mandating Schoolhouse Uniforms in the Public Schools: Free Speech, Research, and Policy (London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015), ISBN 9781475809350; Esan Regmi, Stories of Intersex People from Nepal (Kathmandu: [n.p.], 2016).
12. ^ Reed, Joshua B. "Effects of a Schoolhouse Uniform Policy on an Urban School District." Northern Michigan University. N.p., one August 2011. Web. nineteen April 2015. <https://www.nmu.edu/sites/DrupalEducation/files/UserFiles/Files/Pre-Drupal/SiteSections/Students/GradPapers/Projects/Reed_Joshua_MP.pdf>.Wade, G. Chiliad., & Stafford, Thou. E. (2003). Public School Uniforms: Outcome on Perceptions of Gang Presence, School Climate, and Student Cocky-Perceptions. Education and Urban Society, 35(4), 399–420. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013124503255002
13. ^ ^{a b c} Brunsma, David L.; Rockquemore, Kerry A. "Effects of Pupil Uniforms on Omnipresence, Behavior Problems, Substance Utilize, and Bookish Accomplishment." The Journal of Educational Research 92.1 (1998): 53-62. 31 March 2015.
14. ^ ^{a b c} Brunsma, David L., and Kerry A. Rockquemore. "Effects of Pupil Uniforms on Attendance, Behavior Problems, Substance Use, and Bookish Achievement." The Journal of Educational Enquiry 92.ane (1998): 53-62. Web. 31 March 2015. <https://kinesthesia.unlv.edu/sloe/Courses/EPY%20702/Course%20Exercises/Lecture%201%20Materials/Articles/Brunsma%20et%20al.%twenty(1998).pdf Archived 5 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine>
15. ^ ^{a b} Northen, Stephanie (18 Jan 2011). "School uniform does not ameliorate results – discuss". The Guardian . Retrieved 25 February 2017.
16. ^ Brunsma, David Fifty. Uniforms in Public Schools: A Decade of Research and Argue. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education, 2006. Print.
17. ^ Colasanti, Michael. "School Uniforms and Dress Codes: State Policies." StateNote (2008). Education Commission of the States. Teaching Committee of the States. Web. xix April 2015. <http://world wide web.ecs.org/clearinghouse/77/97/7797.pdf>.
18. ^ Kraft, Jacquelyn. Social club's Perceptions and Attitudes Toward School Uniforms. Research Paper. University of Wisconsin-Stout. August 2003. Spider web http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=ten.ane.1.390.8124&rep=rep1&blazon=pdf.
19. ^ "Those icky School Uniforms (B)". Optionality Magazine. Archived from the original on 7 January 2021. Retrieved 30 November 2007.
20. ^ "Do 46, South. 2008 – Proper School Attire". DepEd Philippines. 10 June 2008.
21. ^ "Authorization Strategic Statement of Inverclyde Didactics Service". Gourock Loftier School. Archived from the original on 14 March 2010. Retrieved 28 September 2009.
22. ^ "School uniform requirement to be abolished". todayszaman.com. Archived from the original on 12 Feb 2019. Retrieved eleven February 2019.
23. ^ "Offset Amendment Schools: The Five Freedoms - Court Case." Get-go Amendment Schools: The V Freedoms - Court Case. Outset Amendment Schools. Web. 19 April 2015. <http://www.firstamendmentschools.org/freedoms/example.aspx?id=1690>.
24. ^ "Showtime Amendment Schools: The Five Freedoms - Court Instance." First Amendment Schools: The Five Freedoms - Courtroom Example. Beginning Amendment Schools. Web. xix Apr 2015. <http://www.firstamendmentschools.org/freedoms/case.aspx?id=1693>
25. ^ "Jacobs v. Clark County Schoolhouse District." The Recorder. 12 May 2008. Spider web. xix April 2015. <http://www.therecorder.com/id=1202421325288/Jacobs-5-Clark-County-Schoolhouse-District?slreturn=20150319150918>.
26. ^ "Appeals Court Revives Reno School Uniform Case." Elko Daily. Elko Daily Free Press, xvi February 2014. Web. 12 April 2015. <http://elkodaily.com/news/appeals-courtroom-revives-reno-school-uniform-case/article_a8e75868-973c-11e3-8412-001a4bcf887a.html>.
27. ^ Connell, R. W. "Instruction the Boys: New Research on Masculinity, and Gender Strategies for Schools". Teachers College Record 98:2 (1996): 206-235. 31 March 2015.
28. ^ ^{a b} Happel, Alison. "Ritualized girling: schoolhouse uniforms and the compulsory performance of gender." Journal of Gender Studies 22:one (2013): 92-96. i April 2015.
29. ^ "Customized Uniform School Chugalug - Manufacturer- SR.Imprint". Sr.banner.
30. ^ Craik, J. (2007). "Uniforms Exposed: The Proliferation of Uniforms in Popular Civilisation as Markers of Change and Identity." Uniformierungen in Bewegung. Ed. Gabreile Mentges, Dagmar Neuland-Kitzerow, and Birgit Richard. Munster: Waxmann Verlag. 7-53.
31. ^ Freeman, Hadley (6 March 2017). "Non wearing the trousers: why practise some schools still have sexist uniform rules?". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 11 Feb 2019.
32. ^ ^{a b} Bennett, Susan (2015). "Gender Relations in Elite Coeducational Schools." PhD diss., Deakin Academy (Victoria, Australia).
33. ^ American Psychological Clan, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA Task Forcefulness on the Sexualization of Girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html
34. ^ Uranaka, Taiga (12 November 2003). "Man who gave united states loose white socks eyes comeback". Retrieved 11 Feb 2019 – via Japan Times Online.
35. ^ "Japan'due south schoolgirls ready the trend". The Contained. 23 November 1997. Retrieved 11 February 2019.
36. ^ Southgate, Jessica, and Lucy Russell (2018). Street Harassment: Information technology's Non OK - Girls' experiences and views. Plan International U.k.. Retrieved 28 April 2020.
37. ^ Erickson, Amanda (8 Oct 2018). "'Sexualized and fetishized': Girls in Britain say their school uniforms make them a target of harassment." The Washington Mail service. Retrieved 28 April 2020.
38. ^ "The Perspective on School Uniforms". The Perspective. 17 November 2017. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
39. ^ The Cosmic school effect is the thought that certain elements in a cosmic school provide children with a stronger bookish education
40. ^ Hoffman, Jan (6 Nov 2009). "Tin a Boy Wear a Skirt to Schoolhouse?" The New York Times.
41. ^ Hoffman, J. (eight November 2009). "Can a Boy Wearable a Skirt to School?" The New York Times.
42. ^ "School Uniforms - ProCon.org". schoolhouse-uniforms.procon.org . Retrieved 26 February 2016.
43. ^ "Schoolhouse Uniforms - ProCon.org". schoolhouse-uniforms.procon.org . Retrieved 26 February 2016.
44. ^ ^{a b} Wade, K. 1000., & Stafford, M. E. (2003). Public School Uniforms: Effect on Perceptions of Gang Presence, Schoolhouse Climate, and Student Self-Perceptions. Education and Urban Society, 35(4), 399–420. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013124503255002
45. ^ ^{a b c} Murray, R. Grand. (1997). The Touch on of Schoolhouse Uniforms on Schoolhouse Climate. NASSP Bulletin, 81(593), 106–112. http://doi.org/10.1177/019263659708159314
46. ^ Wilde, Marian. The Fence Over Dress Codes and Uniforms (2006): 1-3.Boward Teacher's Spousal relationship. July 2006. Web. 9 April 201
47. ^ ^{a b} "Schoolhouse Dress Codes - FindLaw". Findlaw . Retrieved 26 February 2016.
48. ^ ^{a b} Zhou, Li (xx October 2015). "Why School Dress Codes Are Sexist". The Atlantic . Retrieved 26 February 2016.
49. ^ "Customized School Uniform Necktie - SR.Imprint". Sr.banner.
50. ^ "Research on schoolhouse uniforms - it'south clear, they disadvantage girls". Girls' Uniform Agenda. xiv June 2017. Retrieved nineteen November 2019.
51. ^ DaCosta, Yard. (2006). Apparel lawmaking blues: An exploration of urban students' reactions to a public Loftier Schoolhouse uniform policy. The Journal of Negro Education, 75(1), 49-59.
52. ^ Bodine, A. (2003). Schoolhouse uniforms and discourses on babyhood. Babyhood, 10(one), 43-63.
53. ^ Joseph, Nathan. Uniforms and Nonuniforms: Advice through Clothing. Greenwood Press, New York, NY, 1986. ProQuest. Web. 18 Apr 2015.
54. ^ Wade, Kathleen Kiley, and Mary E. Stafford. "Public School Uniforms. Upshot on Perceptions of Gang Presence, Schoolhouse Climate, and Educatee Self-Perceptions." Teaching and Urban Society 35.four (2003): 399-420. ProQuest. Spider web. 18 April 2015.
55. ^ Wilde, Marian (July 2006). "The Debate Over Clothes Codes and Uniforms" (PDF). Boward Teacher's Union. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 April 2015.

External links [edit]

• Data and Resources: Public School Uniforms Archived 21 February 2015 at the Wayback Machine
• What's in a school uniform? BBC
• Schoolhouse Compatible: Japan at Boys' Historical Habiliment
• The Impossible Question of School Uniforms at Racked

Share this post